With regards to the review of Wine and Rank Poison...surely David would have chosen a better pseudonym if he was up to what he's being accused of? Wouldn't he?
I have to say though, the evidence doesn't look too good.
Given the furore surrounding Bull Running For Girls, I would have thought anything other than absolute transparency would have been viewed as a definite no-no. Personally, I don't think David should have published a review written under a pseudonym for any subject whatsoever. I'm not a reviewer so I don't know if this is common practice but it seems rather strange to me.